3.3.2. Aerodynamics of Jet Exhausts Part 2

3.3.2.1. Introduction

3.3.2.1.1. Background

  • Civil aviation traffic will increase in the future, so reduce:
    • direct operating costs

    • fuel burn

    • emissions

    • noise

  • Need to improve design technology in:
    • Motor

    • Propulsor

  • Improve motor thermal efficiency by:
    • Increase TET

    • Increase OPR

  • Future architectures:
    • Higher BPR (currently 11, will be 15+)

    • Lower FPR

  • This will:
    • Lower specific thrust

    • Improve propulsive efficiency

  • Why is the exhaust important?
    • Increasing BPR will increase gross to net propulsive thrust

    • Designs are therefore more sensitive to variations in gross propulsive thrust

    • Gross propulsive thrust is linearly dependent on the aerodynamic performance of the exhaust

  • Which components will be analysed?
    • Bypass duct

    • Nozzle

    • Post exit components

3.3.2.1.2. Exhaust system performance accounting

  • What is separate jet exhausts?
    • Core cowl separates core flow from bypass flow

    • Protruding core plug limits the length of core cowl

  • What is the problem with separate jet exahusts?
    • Can be substantial sources of thrust loss (gross thrust reduced by 2%)

  • How is performance measured?
    • Discarge coefficient

    • Velocity coefficient

3.3.2.1.3. Design Optimisation of Engine Exhaust Systems

  • CFD is a reliable performance prediction tool

  • It is also efficient and used in design optimisation (Efficiency is depending on mesh size, geometry complexity, schemes, solvers and models used)

3.3.2.1.3.1. Heath (2015)

  • Axi-symmetric, dual stream plug nozzle

  • Parametric geometry via free-form deformation and 3rd order b-splines

  • RANS solver

  • Steady state

  • Unstructured grid

  • Adjoint, grid deformation, grid adaption to obtain gradients

  • Optimisation using sequential quadratic programming (SQP)

  • Minimise integral of near-field pressure disturbances relative to freestream flow

  • Gross thrust gain of 0.2% relative to baseline

3.3.2.1.3.2. Clemen (2012)

  • Why not use HYDRA for?
    • Linearised unsteady solver

    • Non-linear solver

    • Steady adjoint solver

    • Harmonic adjoint solver

  • Integrated framework for high BPR turbofan with core mounted gearbox Like Ultrafan?

  • 2nd order splines for parametric geometry

  • 3D RANS solver HYDRA

  • Steady state

  • Hybrid optimisation comprising initial design of experiment coupled with RSM and global optimiser

  • RSM (Response Surface Modelling) based on design of experiment results using interpolations based on radial basis functions

  • Genetic algorithm to minimise total pressure loss within bypass duct

  • 0.1 % reduction in pressure loss

3.3.2.1.3.3. Haderlie and Crossley (2010)

  • Axi-symmetric supersonic inlet

  • Modified splitter geometry that separates core and bypass flow

  • Parametric geometry based on Kulfan’s CST method

  • RANS flow field

  • Multiblock structured mesh

  • Optimisation based on design of experiment - Latin hypercube

  • Surrogate model using Kriging interpolation

  • Optimisation from genetic algorithm and local gradient based sequential quadratic programming

  • Optimisations used total pressure recovery and peak radial distortion intensity at the inlet’s aerodynamic interface plane

  • Improved splitter design that satisfied imposed geometric constraints

  • Current paper is based mainly on this one

3.3.2.1.3.4. Qiu (2014)

  • Unsteady, continous adjoint-based acoustic propagation method

  • Optimise the design of a low bypass duct for a civil turbofan

  • Hick-Henne shape functions for parametric model of bypass and nozzle

  • Optimisation based on local gradient based algorithm driven by Jacobian from adjoint method

  • Minimise tonal noise

  • Reduced overall SPL in far-field by 2.78dB

3.3.2.1.4. Scope of Present Work

  • Aerodynamics of the exhaust is important for future high BPR engines

  • What is unique about the current work?
    • Previous authors have looked at optimising exhaust nozzles

    • A holistic approach for separate jet exhausts including bypass, core duct and post exit components has not been reported

    • Impact of high BPR engines and lower FPR on exahust system design and optimisation has not been reported

  • What is the approach?
    • Cycle analysis

    • Geometry parameterisation

    • Mesh generation

    • RANS flow solution

  • What is new?
    • Expand optimisation strategy using DOE (Design of Experiment), RSM (Response Surface Modelling) and GA (Genetic Algorithm)

  • What is being optimised?
    • Current and future engine architectures

    • Large turbofans

    • Optimise the exhaust designs

3.3.2.2. Numerical Approach

3.3.2.2.1. Aerodynamic Design of Separate-Jet Exhausts

  • What is GEMINI?
    • Tool developed is GEMINI

    • Designs complete exhaust system for designated engine cycle using key engine hardpoints

    • Applicable to:
      • Engine performance simulation

      • Exhaust duct and nozzle aeroline parameterisation

      • Viscous compressible flow

  • What is the process?
    • Designate a set of thermodynamic cycles and geometric design parameters

    • Analyse engine at design point and off design (0D conditions) - Turbomatch, output bypass and core sizes and flow capacities, at steady state conditions

    • Inverse design to create 2D axi-symmetric model

    • Automatic generation of grid

    • Convege CFD solution

    • Determine discharge and velocity coefficients

3.3.2.2.2. Exhaust System Parametric Geometry Definition

  • How is the parametric geometry defined?
    • Kulfan’s CST functions

    • Qin’s CST variations

    • Bypass, core, duct exhaust are reduced to a set of analytical expressions

    • The expressions are functions of a standard set of design parameters

  • How is the nozzle designed?
    • Geometric throat area is known

    • An effective convegent-divergent ratio is defined

    • Application of the rolling ball area estimation method to nozzle exit plane and upstream CP results in a series of control points that satisfy the prescribed design parameters

  • How is the upstream duct defined?
    • Direct control of a series of control points

  • Why is the engine intake considered?
    • To capture the effect of inlet mass flow capture ratio

    • To then account for the effect of the static pressure distributionon the nacelle

    • To then account for the effect of freestream supression on the aerodynamic performance of the exhaust system

  • How is the geometry defined?
    • Upstream duct via specifying position, slope and curvature within a series of control points

    • Core cowl and plug are modelled as straight lines

    • Includes a third nozzle

3.3.2.2.3. DSE and Optimisation

  • What is done in this paper?
    • Extend GEMINI

    • Implement DSE and optimisation environment

    • Non-linear nature must be dealt with

    • Must mitigate the cost of numerous CFD applications

  • How is the process of DSE done?
    • Deployment of DOE method to explore the available design space

    • Construct RSMs from DOE results

  • What kind of DOE is used?
    • Latin Hypercube

  • What is a RSM?
    • Hypersurface describing the mathematical relationship between a set of imposed design inputs and outputs

    • The use of RSMs will avoid a prohibatively large number of CFD simulations

    • Interpolation using Gaussian process regression, Kriging interpolation

    • Performance metrics are discharge and velocity coefficient

    • Leave-one-out cross validation used to check predictive accuracy of RSMs

  • How is the optimisation done?
    • Global method to avoid being trapped in locally optimal solution - GA (Genetic Algorithm)

3.3.2.3. Results and Discussion

3.3.2.3.1. Definition of Baseline Engines

  • How are the baseline engines defined?
    • Optimise low pressure exhaust system design and core afterbody aerolines for current and future aero-engines.

    • BPR current = 11

    • BPR future = 15

    • OPR, TET, component efficiencies selected according to technology guidelines

    • Each cycle optimised wrt FPR to maximise specific thrust

    • 2D axi-symmetric

    • Geometry from public domain

    • Predictions at mid-cruise

    • Bypass is choked, core is unchoked

3.3.2.3.2. Parametric Design Space Definition

  • How are the parameters designed?
    • 11 to 12 variables for future and current engines

    • Outer line angle is kept constant for future engine

3.3.2.3.3. Design Space Exploration

  • How is the design space explored?

    • Design space discretised using Latin Hypercube

    • 360 exhaust geometries

    • Correlation between design variables and performance metrics was investigated

    • Hinton Diagram using Pearson’s product-moment correlation

    • Shows only a few parameters influence the performance metrics

  • Within the range of assumptions, the aerodynamic performance of the exhaust is decoupled from the intake and nacelle forebody

  • Changes applied to the exhaust do not influence the intake or nacelle

3.3.2.3.4. Response Surface Modelling

  • How are the RSMs constructed?
    • Using DOE data

    • Interpolation using Gaussian processes regression (Kriging interpolation)

    • Quadratic regression function and squared exponential autocorrelation function

  • How are the RSMs checked?
    • Leave one out cross validation

    • Employs all the avaliable data apart from one, which is the one to prediction

    • Prediction is compared with original raw data for accuracy

    • Surrogate model predictions are correlated against raw data using Pearson’s product moment of correlation

    • Also assesses averge model error and standard deviation for each performance metric

  • Result shows that CFD raw data and predicted data has very high correlation.

  • Could be improved using a larger amount of data

  • Low percentage error

  • Standard deviation is of similar order to error, so data is scattered - shows non-linearity of the system

3.3.2.3.5. Exhaust System Design Optimisation

  • How is the optimisation performed?
    • Genetic algorithm

    • Advantage of using RSMs is that they are more efficient than CFD models

  • What is the process for the GA?
    • For current and future engines

    • Optimise in terms of overall velocity coefficient

    • Population size is 10 times number of design variables

    • 40 generations

    • Convergence criterion of \(10^{-12}\)

  • What are the results of the optimisation?
    • Good solution achieved within 500 evaluations

    • Still contains small number of unfit individuals

    • Improvement wrt baseline values is large (2-4% in thrust)

    • CP to exit length ratio is increased (as before) mitigating strong shock

    • Also flow separations are mitigated

3.3.2.4. Conclusions

  • Design optimisation for separate jet exhausts for future civil aero engines

  • Modules for:
    • Cycle analysis

    • Geometry parameterisation

    • Mesh generation

    • Viscous compressible flow solution

  • Novel analytical geometry tool using CST functions

  • 2D axi-symmetric RANS CFD model

  • Extended formulation to include:
    • DOE

    • RSM

    • GA

  • Used to optimise:
    • Current engine

    • Future engine

  • Design optimisation can increase net propulsive force by 1.4% or 3.4% for future and current engines

  • Can identify design guidelines and mitigate undesirable flow features